Xinhua Silk Road - Belt and Road Portal, China's silk road economic belt and 21st Century Maritime Silk Road Website Xinhua Silk Road - Belt and Road Portal, China's silk road economic belt and 21st Century Maritime Silk Road Website
Subscribe CustomBlackClose

Belt & Road Weekly Subscription Form

download_pop

Research ReportCustomBlackClose

The full edition of the report is available at Xinhua Silk Road Database. You can click the “Table of Content” to have a general understanding of it.

Click on the button below to create your account and get immediate access to thousands of articles.

Start a Free Trial

Xinhua Silk Road Database
Company

China's Supreme Court rules in favor of Michael Jordan over trademark dispute

April 10, 2020


Abstract : China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) has overturned earlier rulings by Beijing courts to favor U.S. basketball legend Michael Jordan's trademark appeal against a Chinese sportswear firm that allegedly infringed upon his naming rights.

BEIJING, April 9 (Xinhua) -- China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) has overturned earlier rulings by Beijing courts to favor U.S. basketball legend Michael Jordan's trademark appeal against a Chinese sportswear firm that allegedly infringed upon his naming rights.

The SPC ruling prohibits Qiaodan Sports from using the Chinese translation of Jordan's name, Qiao Dan, together with its logo of a silhouetted basketball player, ending an eight-year trademark dispute.

However, it still allows the Chinese company to continue using either the logo or the name of Qiao Dan seperately.

But the Supreme Court referred the case, over the use of the logo, for retrial by the State Intellectual Property Office.

In 2016, Jordan won the right to his name in Chinese characters, but the Supreme Court upheld the firm's right to use its trademark "Qiaodan" in pinyin.

Qiaodan Sports said in a statement on Wednesday that the ruling "would not impact the normal use of [its] existing trademarks, nor would it affect normal business operations."

In 2012, Michael Jordan, widely known as "Qiaodan" in China, accused Qiaodan Sports of unauthorized use of his name and identity. He lodged an appeal to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board of the State Administration for Industry & Commerce to revoke the trademarks in dispute, but was rejected.

Later, Jordan filed lawsuits against the adjudication of the trademark authority but lost.

Chinese courts originally upheld the adjudication on the grounds that the Chinese translation "Qiaodan" is the translation of a common family name, and does not necessarily refer to the U.S. basketball star's name only.

In 2015, Jordan appealed to the SPC.

Scan the QR code and push it to your mobile phone

Keyword: Jordan trademark Qiaodan

Most Read

Write to Us belt & road login close

Do you want to be a contributor to Xinhua Silk Road and tell us your Belt & Road story? Send your articles to [email protected] and share your stories with more people.

Click on the button below to create your account and get im http://img.silkroad.news.cn/templates/silkroad/en2017te access to thousands of articles.

Start a Free Trial

Ask Us A Question belt & road login close

If you have any questions, please enter them in the box below.

Identifying code Reload

Write to Us belt & road login close

Do you want to be a contributor to Xinhua Silk Road and tell us your Belt & Road story? Send your articles to silkroadweekly@xinhua.org and share your stories with more people.

Click on the button below to create your account and get im http://img.silkroad.news.cn/templates/silkroad/en2017te access to thousands of articles.

Start a Free Trial